9mm vs. 40 Caliber: Analyzing Ballistic Performance Differences

The debate between 9mm and .40 S&W calibers has stirred the firearms community for years. Each caliber has its staunch supporters and its fair share of critics. The 9mm, known for its widespread use in military and police forces, has gained popularity due to its manageable recoil, higher magazine capacity, and general affordability. On the other hand, the .40 S&W, created as a law enforcement round to provide a middle ground between the 9mm and the more potent .45 ACP, offers a different balance of stopping power and magazine capacity.

This discussion often revolves around the specifics of each caliber's performance. Aspects such as ballistic capabilities, terminal performance, and cost per round are frequently analyzed to weigh each option's merits. Additionally, advancements in ammunition technology have narrowed the gap in performance between these two calibers, further complicating the debate. Practical considerations also play a significant role for both self-defense proponents and shooting enthusiasts, influencing individual preference for one caliber over another.

Key Takeaways

  • The 9mm is appreciated for its lower recoil and higher capacity, while the .40 S&W offers a different balance with greater stopping power.
  • Advancements in ammunition technology have narrowed the performance gap between the 9mm and .40 S&W.
  • The 9mm vs .40 S&W debate often influences personal preference by anticipated use, recoil sensitivity, and cost.

Historical Context and Development

In handgun calibers, the 9mm Luger and .40 S&W have distinct origins and developments shaped by historical events and the evolving needs of law enforcement and military organizations.

Origins of 9mm Luger

Georg Luger designed the 9mm Luger cartridge in 1902. It was officially adopted by the German military in 1908 and quickly became a standard for military forces around the world due to its balance of velocity, manageable recoil, and capacity. This caliber's efficiency and effectiveness established it as a foundational round in the small arms category.

  • Year Designed: 1902
  • Designer: Georg Luger
  • Adoption: German military, 1908

Development of .40 S&W

In contrast, the .40 S&W was developed in the late 20th century as a direct response to the 1986 Miami shootout involving the FBI, which showed the need for a more powerful round than the 9mm but with better control than the .45 ACP. Smith & Wesson, in partnership with Winchester, designed the .40 S&W to meet these needs. This led to the cartridge being released in 1990, just before the Federal Assault Weapons Ban was enacted, influencing its rapid adoption.

  • Motivation: Miami shootout, 1986
  • Designers: Smith & Wesson and Winchester
  • Release Year: 1990
  • Comparison to Other Calibers:
    • More power than 9mm Luger
    • Better control than 10mm and .45 ACP

Ballistics and Performance

In assessing 9mm vs. 40 S&W, ballistics and performance are critical factors. They directly influence the caliber's effectiveness in self-defense and tactical scenarios.

Comparing Calibers

Bullet Diameter and Weight:

  • 9mm: Typically, bullet diameters are around 0.355 inches, with weights ranging from 115 to 147 grains.
  • .40 S&W: Bullet diameters are approximately 0.4 inches, with standard bullet weights between 135 and 180 grains.

Muzzle Velocity and Energy:

  • 9mm: Muzzle velocity ranges from 950 to 1,400 feet per second, translating to muzzle energies between 320 to 420 foot pounds.
  • .40 S&W: Muzzle velocities range from 980 to 1,300 feet per second, with muzzle energies from 350 to 500 foot pounds.

Terminal Ballistics

Penetration and Stopping Power:

  • The 9mm can achieve deep penetration, especially with high-quality hollow point ammunition from makers like Winchester, and delivers effective terminal performance.
  • The .40 S&W is renowned for its stopping power due to its larger bullet diameter and heavier projectiles that can deliver more kinetic energy on impact.

Ballistic Gel Testing:

  • FMJ ammo in 9mm usually penetrates deeper in ballistic gel than .40 S&W due to its higher sectional density.
  • Hollow points in both calibers expand adequately upon impact, but ones in .40 S&W create larger cavities due to greater size.

Recoil and Handling


  • 9mm firearms typically exhibit less recoil, resulting in lower muzzle rise, allowing quicker follow-up shots than larger calibers.
  • .40 S&W handguns have a more pronounced recoil, which may affect handling for shooters, especially those with less experience or strength.


  • Recoil management is crucial in rapid-fire situations. The 9 mm's less intense recoil supports better overall control and accuracy.
  • While the .40 S&W's recoil is often considered a hindrance, it can be mitigated through practice and proper technique to maintain performance.

Practical Considerations

In the debate between 9mm and .40 caliber for handguns, practical considerations such as ammunition capacity and firearm size and relevance in law enforcement and self-defense scenarios play a pivotal role in making an informed choice.

Ammunition Capacity and Handgun Size

The 9mm tends to offer a higher magazine capacity than the .40 S&W due to its smaller diameter, allowing for more rounds in the handgun. For instance, the popular Glock 17 chambered in 9mm typically holds 17 rounds, while the Glock 22 chambered in .40 S&W generally has a magazine capacity of 15 rounds. This difference can be significant when considering handgun size and concealed carry constraints where additional magazines may be impractical. Furthermore, a larger magazine capacity might reduce the need for a reload in a critical self-defense situation.

  • Glock 17 (9mm): 17 rounds
  • Glock 22 (.40 S&W): 15 rounds

The pistol size directly influences the handgun calibers a user may opt for, with larger handguns typically offering increased capacity. Submachine guns, like the ones used by military and law enforcement often during World War II, also favor the 9mm due to its NATO standardization.

Law Enforcement and Self-Defense Use

Law enforcement agencies, which in the past widely adopted the .40 S&W, such as with the SIG Sauer P226 and Glock 23, have been transitioning to 9mm options like the SIG Sauer P320 due to its lower recoil, reliability, and ample ammo options. The Glock 23, a compact version of the Glock 22, once favored for its balance between size and power, has seen competition from 9mm variants offering similar stopping power with less felt recoil.

Shot placement is critical for self-defense, and the 9 mm lower recoil facilitates accuracy, making it a preferred choice for civilian shooters and the concealed carry community. Modern advancements in bullet design, particularly in JHP (jacketed hollow point) ammo, allow the 9mm to achieve effective stopping power that was traditionally attributed to larger calibers like the .40 S&W and .357 Magnum.

When considering personal defense:

  • 9mm JHP ammo is known for its balance of penetration and expansion.
  • .40 S&W JHP ammo often provides deeper penetration and larger wound channels.

The choice between these two pistol cartridges often comes down to personal preference, with some individuals favoring the 9mm for its capacity and recoil profile and others opting for the .40 caliber for its perceived edge in power. Furthermore, the availability of police trade-in firearms has made both calibers accessible to the public.

Varieties of Ammunition

When comparing 9mm and .40 S&W ammunition, the options vary in terms of purpose, with defensive ammo and practice rounds offering different characteristics tailored to their specific uses.

Defensive Ammo Selection

For personal defense, 9mm and .40 S&W calibers often utilize JHP (jacketed hollow point) bullets due to their controlled expansion upon impact, maximizing stopping power while reducing the risk of over-penetration. Notable options in the defensive realm include the Winchester Silvertip and Federal Premium lines, which are known for their reliability and effectiveness. The pros of hollow point ammo in self-defense include increased stopping power. At the same time, the cons may encompass higher costs and lower magazine capacity when compared to complete metal jacket rounds.

  • 9mm Defensive Ammunition:

    • Winchester Silvertip
    • Federal Premium HST
    • Hornady Critical Defense
  • .40 S&W Defensive Ammunition:

    • Winchester Silvertip
    • Federal Premium HST
    • Hornady Critical Duty

Target Shooting and Practice Rounds

For target shooting, full metal jacket (FMJ) rounds are typically preferred. They are less expensive and have a cleaner pass-through, causing less damage to targets. FMJ ammo is available in commonly found weights for 9mm (115 gr, 124 gr, and 147 gr) and .40 S&W (165 gr and 180 gr). The lower cost per round is a clear advantage for regular practice sessions, although such rounds provide less expansion than JHP ammunition.

  • 9mm Practice Ammunition (Approximate cost: $0.50/round):

    • 115 gr FMJ
    • 124 gr FMJ
    • 147 gr FMJ
  • .40 S&W Practice Ammunition (Approximate cost: $0.60/round):

    • 165 gr FMJ
    • 180 gr FMJ

The table below briefly compares the typical grain weights and associated costs for 9mm and .40 S&W FMJ practice ammunition:


Grain Weight

Cost Per Round (Approx.)


115 gr



124 gr



147 gr


.40 S&W

165 gr


.40 S&W

180 gr


Frequently Asked Questions

When considering 9mm vs .40 caliber, one must account for ballistic performance, defensive use, recoil management, cost, magazine capacity, and terminal effectiveness. These frequently asked questions cover the key distinctions.

What are the ballistics differences between 9mm and .40 caliber rounds?

.40 caliber rounds generally have a larger diameter and are heavier, leading to greater stopping power and barrier penetration. Conversely, 9mm rounds typically achieve higher muzzle velocity.

What factors should be considered when choosing between 9mm and .40 caliber for self-defense?

For self-defense, it's vital to evaluate recoil, the shooter's ability to handle the firearm, the capacity, and the ballistic effectiveness of each caliber in various scenarios.

How does recoil compare between 9mm and .40 caliber handguns?

Recoil is generally more pronounced in .40 caliber handguns due to the heavier bullet and greater power. The 9mm offers comparatively less recoil, which can contribute to better recoil management and quicker follow-up shots.

What are the cost implications of shooting 9mm compared to .40 caliber?

Shooting 9mm is often less expensive than .40 caliber, attributable to 9mm ammunition being more widely produced and in higher demand, leading to lower prices and more availability.

How does magazine capacity differ between 9mm and .40 caliber pistols?

Magazine capacity is generally higher for 9mm pistols than for .40 caliber pistols. This is because the 9mm rounds are smaller, storing more rounds in the same physical space.

Can mm terminal effectiveness of 9mm be compared to .40 S&W?

Terminal effectiveness can vary based on specific ammunition types and scenarios, but the .40 S&W typically exhibits greater stopping power due to its larger and heavier bullet. However, 9mm ammunition technology advances have improved its effectiveness, making the comparison more nuanced.

Back to blog